Out of curiosity: Any reason why there are so few scripts for Bridge? It was one of the things that drove me to Lightroom - If I remember correctly, Bridge uses javascript, whereas Lightroom uses Lua (which I much prefer), but there are tons of plugins written for Lightroom, yet relatively few scripts written for Bridge. Sounds like I should be using Bridge instead of Lightroom (and Adobe should be reconsidering Lr software design ).īridge has a powerful, scripting language, which is more than can be said for Lr. So far as editing images go, ACR is faster than Lr at pretty much everything. This seems like a glaring omission in Lightroom. I'm sure some people really appreciate this.Īlso, unlike Lr, metadata can be 'appended' or 'replaced', which a pretty major benefit to those who make extensive use of metadata. Seems like another Lr area that is ripe for improvement.Īlso, unlike Lr, the UI is very flexible in so far as panels can be moved around. Only faster if the Lr lib previews are not available yet, but unfortunately since editing an image invalidates the lib preview, this happens far too often. it can use the embedded previews, thus making it way faster than Lr. I know a lot more about Lightroom than Bridge. (I thought one of the advantages of Lightroom (over Bridge) was the database, and consequent speed for lib filtering and what have you). I stand corrected - my apology for disseminating misinformation. This was long before many of the current pre release testers (Lr and Bridge) even knew Lr existed. The external folk who drove Lr in the direction it eventually went were the same folk who drove Bridge. Also, 'Bridge Talk' (the code underlying Bridge's ability to communicate with other Creative Suite applications is used by Lr when sending images to Photoshop. Bridge has a powerful, scripting language, which is more than can be said for Lr. Also, unlike Lr, metadata can be 'appended' or 'replaced', which a pretty major benefit to those who make extensive use of metadata. Also, unlike Lr, the UI is very flexible in so far as panels can be moved around. For example, it can use the embedded previews, thus making it way faster than Lr. In 'some' respects, Bridge is better and faster than Lr for some users. Lightroom uses an image database, Bridge just "wings it" without the database.Īctually, Bridge does use a database.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |